|  | 
               
                |  PSEUD AWAKENING
 
  
 
                     
                      | (Punch 
                        - 1991) Early installation art sent up
 |   
 |   
                | Finding yourself at an art show these days can be a testing 
                  experience. It's not just that the paintings and sculptures 
                  no longer resemble anything (that funny old idea went out of 
                  the window decades ago), it's more that there are no paintings 
                  and sculptures.
 
 You are more likely to be confronted with huge lumps of welded 
                  aluminium, a set of giant dental casts, a filing cabinet filled 
                  with rotting carpet, a room full of live butterflies or deep 
                  in engine oil - to give but four examples from the last few 
                  years. [1]
 
 So how do you cope? Let's not be narrow-minded about this. Fuddy-duddy 
                  old critics such as Brian Sewell of the Evening Standard will 
                  foam at the mouth and talk about the Emperor's New Clothes. 
                  But you don't want to look silly and go against the great relentless 
                  flow of Art History, do you? No. So get with it. Here's Punch's 
                  guide to How To Behave At An Exhibition (complete with footnotes).
 
 - On Arriving At The Opening: You walk in to find yourself in 
                  a room with bare walls, a peeling blue ceiling, a hundred chattering 
                  trendies, a trestle table full of beer and wine bottles, an 
                  old trolley piled with empties, a couple of pushchairs, and 
                  someone's old coat on the floor.
 
 - Wrong Thing To Say: 'So where's the sculpture then?' 
                  [2]
 
 No, no, no! If you can't see the work you are probably in it. 
                  It may well be an installation. [3] Look carefully 
                  - but discreetly around you. That peeling blue ceiling. Could 
                  that be part of it? Could that be all of it? [4] 
                  Look for any printed cards on the wall to give you a clue. You 
                  may find one saying: Blue Ceiling 1991. (Emulsion Paint and 
                  Nitromors on Ceiling.) Congratulations. You can now start thinking 
                  of something intelligent to say.
 
 But it probably won't be that simple. The card you will find 
                  will almost certainly read Untitled 1991. [5] 
                  And then the hunt begins. That empties trolley by the bar, that 
                  pushchair, that old coat. Any one of them could be Untitled 
                  1991. Don't stop there. Look carefully at the bar, the guests, 
                  yourself. [6] Yes, even you might have been 
                  appropriated. [7]
 
 - Get Yourself A Drink: You now pay £3.00 for a bottle 
                  of Beck's (oh for the days when they used to have free drink 
                  at openings). You have realised that the work on display is 
                  Blue Ceiling 1991, Empties Trolley 1991 and Untitled 1991  
                  which you're fairly sure is the old coat. Though it may be the 
                  pushchairs.
 
 - Wrong Thing To Say: 'D'you like modern art yourself? I find 
                  these avant-garde things really stimulating. Of course, it's 
                  not to everyone's taste but you've got to hand it to him, it's 
                  really well made.'
 
 Oh dear, oh dear. Where to start? Talking about 'Modern Art' 
                  is a dead giveaway, revealing you to be on the intellectual 
                  level of a slime mould. Modern Art began in the 1860s and ended 
                  in the 1970s. After that came Post-Modern Art, which finished 
                  for the very last time sometime last year. 'Avant-garde' is 
                  equally inept. [8] You can't even be an Abstract 
                  Expressionist these days unless you're over 50 with a drink 
                  problem and two divorces behind you.
 
 Assuming the artist is male is very risky. The issue of gender 
                  is a hot one. Don't, whatever you do, get into a discussion 
                  about feminism. [9]
 
 Never point out how well made the art is. Any artists worth 
                  their salt don't make their own art. What they do is either: 
                  appropriate found objects, or if they have an idea of their 
                  own, get somebody to make it for them.
 
 Look carefully at those cards again. Under Untitled 1991 you 
                  may find 'Made with the assistance of the Pit-Bull Welding Co 
                  Ltd, Shoreditch'. This means the work has actually been made 
                  by some poor sod at the Pit-Bull Welding Co. He's unlikely to 
                  be at the opening but if he is you will find him standing in 
                  a corner. He will be easy to spot, being the only person in 
                  the room in a three-piece suit with his hair brushed.
 
 Right Thing To Say: 'Hi. What a great party. Yuh, late September's 
                  the only time. The thing to do is go direct to French estate 
                  agents. Is she still having an affair with that tutor from Goldsmiths?'
 
 Basically, the really cool people talk about anything but the 
                  work. They turn their backs to it, tread heavily over it, bitch 
                  about the artist's private life or how they managed to get a 
                  show in such a prestigious gallery. So join in. Talk about house 
                  prices or fast cars. Artists aren't poor these days. They can't 
                  afford to be poor, not if they want to get anywhere. The big 
                  fish are neo-geo millionaires such as Jeff Koons who spent years 
                  working on Wall Street so he could afford to pay the Italian 
                  craftsmen who make all his work. If actually asked your opinion, 
                  you can be 98 per cent sure this is another, less successful 
                  artist, who knows the exhibitor really well personally, has 
                  probably had a relationship with him or her at some stage or 
                  other. Be kind. Mutter something like, 'I agree with the Artscribe 
                  [10] review...Maybe she should make the concern 
                  of her work more visible...I thought the trolley assemblage 
                  was very witty.' This will infuriate them.
 
 Footnotes
 
 (1) Frank Stella, Grenville Davey, Melanie 
                  Counsell, Damian Hirst, Richard Wilson, respectively.
 
 (2) Nobody uses the word sculpture these 
                  days. Say 'object' or, if really daring, 'assemblage'.'Work' 
                  is a safe general term.
 
 (3) Which means the artist has 'intervened' 
                  and subtly altered The Space in some way or other. Get to grips 
                  with these phrases.
 
 (4) An installation by Bethan Hughes 
                  last year involved her carpeting her room. That was it. So be 
                  vigilant.
 
 (5) Almost all work these days is called 
                  Untitled 1991, Or Untitled 1990, or whatever. You may think 
                  that this is because all the artists are devoid of imagination. 
                  Far from it. Some years ago the critic Clement Greenberg insisted 
                  that Art Isn't About Anything. Since then artists have been 
                  terrified of titles. Greenberg, incidentally, is one of the 
                  names to drop.
 
 (6) No joke. An American Conceptualist 
                  called Les Levine ran a Canadian-kosher restaurant in New York 
                  as an art work, unbeknown to its patrons.
 
 (7) A long word for borrow. The artist 
                  gets hold of a piece of old scrap metal from a junkyard (known 
                  as a Found Object) and then sticks it in a gallery. By doing 
                  this he has altered its Context, turning it into Art. Another 
                  form of appropriation involves copying another artist's work. 
                  An American called Sherrie Levine (no relation to Les) did a 
                  lot of this, If only Tom Keating had known what he was.
 
 (8) In the art world, 'avant-garde' doesn't 
                  mean what the dictionary tells us it means. It refers specifically 
                  to 19th century painters such as Courbet and Manet. It also 
                  refers to underground Sixties artists. Basically, it's best 
                  not to risk using art labels at all. Dada, for example, is an 
                  early 20th century movement. It also means hobby-horse in French, 
                  something entirely different to small children and. 'yes, yes' 
                  in various Slavic languages.
 
 (9) Feminism in the art world is a movement 
                  all its own. Key names: Judy Chicago, Mary Kelly, Miriam Schapiro.
 
 (10) The bible of the art scene. Buy 
                  it regularly and don't be put off by the fact that many of the 
                  articles appear not to be written in English. In Artscribe, 
                  people, 'scrutinise precisely the traumas that constitute sexual 
                  identity', they 'explore the issues surrounding the codes of 
                  desire' (whatever they are), and even, on occasion, 'engineer 
                  a structurally conspicuous anti-consumption.'
 |  |